case law Case law is regulation that is based on judicial decisions rather than law based on constitutions , statutes , or regulations . Case legislation concerns exclusive disputes resolved by courts using the concrete facts of the case. By contrast, statutes and regulations are written abstractly. Case regulation, also used interchangeably with common law , refers back to the collection of precedents and authority established by previous judicial decisions with a particular issue or subject.
For legal professionals, there are specific rules regarding case citation, which change depending within the court and jurisdiction hearing the case. Proper case regulation citation inside a state court might not be ideal, or perhaps accepted, in the U.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have read the realized counsel with the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments because the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard towards the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession with the subjected premises towards the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to become decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer within the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this component for interim custody of the subject premises if the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary towards the determination of your current case are called obiter dicta, which constitute persuasive authority but are not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil legislation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]
Therefore, this petition is found for being not maintainable which is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and also the petitioners may well seek remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
The proposal appears to be reasonable and acceded to. In the meantime police shall remain neutral in the private dispute between the parties, however, if any from the individuals is indulged in criminal activity the police shall choose prompt action against them under regulation. five. The moment petition is disposed of in the above terms. Read more
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted inside of a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically bring about exoneration from departmental charges based on the same factual grounds. Whilst a writ under Article 199 is offered in specific limited situations, it is generally not the suitable remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full opportunity to cross-analyze witnesses and present his/her defense but didn't encourage the department of his/her innocence.
We are an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of law and also to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed from the Constitution and laws of the United States and this State.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, It is additionally a well-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is issue to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives with the police would be to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and earlier mentioned all, make certain law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police to get more info get scrupulously fair to your offender as well as the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other Courts, Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions are the opinions that are filed on the day that the appellate court issues its decision and tend to be not the court's final opinion.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability from the matter, but couldn't be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took their request to your appellate court.
Generally, only an appeal accepted with the court of previous resort will resolve these kinds of differences and, For most reasons, this kind of appeals are frequently not granted.
Criminal cases Inside the common regulation tradition, courts decide the law applicable into a case by interpreting statutes and implementing precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. In contrast to most civil legislation systems, common regulation systems follow the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their possess previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all lower courts should make decisions constant with the previous decisions of higher courts.